Educating the Youth – Race and The Priesthood

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has recently released new lessons for children about Joseph Smith and the origins of polygamy. I thought it would be useful to tackle another difficult topic – “Race and The Priesthood“:

Elijah Abel, a Black pioneer and early member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, was personally ordained to the priesthood by Joseph Smith in the 1830s. This moment marked an important chapter for Black members in early Church history.

In the mid-1800s, slavery was a harsh reality in the United States, including in the Utah Territory. In 1852, the Utah Territorial Legislature passed the ‘Act in Relation to Service,’ allowing slavery in the territory, a decision supported by some Church leaders, including Brigham Young.

In 1852, Brigham Young publicly declared that Black men could not hold the priesthood, a policy that excluded Black members from temple worship for over 120 years. This decision profoundly shaped the experiences of Black members and the history of the Church.

Jane Manning James, a devoted member of the Church and beloved by Joseph and Emma Smith, was never permitted to enter the temple during her lifetime. Despite her deep faith and contributions, she was sealed, by proxy, to Joseph Smith as a servant—a reflection of the painful exclusions Black members faced under Church policy.

During the 19th and 20th centuries, Church leaders, influenced by societal norms, debated and reflected on the restrictions placed on Black members. Incorrect doctrines, such as the belief that Black people were ‘less valiant’ in the pre-existence or cursed through the lineage of Cain, were used to justify exclusion. While these teachings caused significant harm, African members remained faithful, praying for understanding and inclusion.

During the mid-20th century, some LDS apostles, including Mark E. Petersen, Ezra Taft Benson, and Joseph Fielding Smith, taught ideas opposing civil rights, interracial marriage, and the lifting of the priesthood and temple restrictions. These teachings reflected societal prejudices of their time and contributed to the perpetuation of exclusionary policies within the Church.

During the civil rights era, the Church’s university, Brigham Young University (BYU), faced significant challenges regarding racial integration and equality. In 1969, 14 Black football players from the University of Wyoming were dismissed from their team after protesting BYU’s racial policies by refusing to play. The incident underscored the tensions between civil rights and institutional policies, sparking widespread debate and scrutiny of the Church’s racial practices.

During the Civil Rights Movement, societal and global pressure mounted for equality. While protestors marched for justice, Church leaders began discussing the possibility of change. Some leaders and scholars believed there were no doctrinal reasons for the priesthood and temple restrictions, while others forcefully maintained that the ban was required by Heavenly Father. The era marked a turning point, with increasing recognition of the need to address racial equality within the Church.

In 1978, after years of prayer and deliberation, President Spencer W. Kimball and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles reached a unanimous agreement during a meeting in the Salt Lake Temple to lift the priesthood and temple restrictions for Black members. The decision marked the end of a long-standing policy. Notably, two apostles, including Mark E. Petersen and Delbert L Stapley, were absent from the meeting due to their strong opinions about keeping the ban in place. This moment was a transformative step forward for the Church and its global membership.

Further reading:

The Smallest Act of Kindness

Walking through the grocery store the other day, I walked past Jesus, who wasn’t wearing a face covering.

“Jesus”, I asked, “Would you please put on a mask?”

“Why?”, He asked.

“Because it would make me feel safer.”


I don’t believe in a god or Jesus, but the character of the Jesus I grew up with was always purported to be the most kind, the most compassionate, and the most loving person who ever lived – and we were always taught that we should emulate Him.

There are people now who somehow feel that masks aren’t very effective against the COVID virus, despite the mountains of contradictory data. No amount of showing them the science, experts, etc. will change their minds.

Starting from a position of kindness and empathy, even if masks really weren’t that effective, or even if they didn’t work at all, wouldn’t it be “Christlike” and kind to make this simple gesture – to temporarily wear a piece of cloth over your face – even if it was only to make parents, children, and the vulnerable feel a little bit safer?

You cannot do kindness too soon, for you never know how soon it will be too late.

Ralph Waldo Emerson

Today’s Heretic

In November of 2015, I resigned my membership in The LDS Church. Though an atheist for many years, their “policy” to excommunicate married LGBT members and prevent their children from being blessed, baptized, and ordained was filled with such wanton hate, I refused to be counted among their number, even if only on paper.

LDS Church leadership claimed that the policy was revelation from God, and not intended to punish LGBT members and their children, but rather to protect the children from teachings and information that may cause “rifts” between the children and their parents.

Yesterday, they reversed this policy. A mere 3.5 years since it was introduced. They claim that their reason is “continued revelation” and to “reduce hate.”

By their own reasoning, apparently they no longer need to protect children. In addition, it seems that that God’s revealed ‘policy’ sewed the very hate and contention they now wish to reduce.

These men claim to speak literally to God. They claim to “know his voice.” They claim that their actions are literally guided and commanded by God.

If there is a God, I can only see three explanations for this ridiculous nonsense:

1. God is hateful and contentious and his revelations to His prophets and His church are hateful and contentious.

or

2. God is not hateful nor contentious, but His prophets are hateful and contentious and enact hateful and contentious practices in His church.

or

3. God isn’t talking to these prophets.

I am glad they reversed this policy. It was harmful. It caused LGBT children to feel inferior, lesser, and, in some cases, so distraught that these beautiful, innocent beings felt it necessary to take their own lives. It is impossible for me not to see that this organization is clearly led by wrong-headed, bigoted, willfully ignorant, and unsympathetic men. “Men of their time.”

If we cannot distinguish when these so-called prophets speak as prophets or speak as hate-filled men, then there is no obligation to heed their words at all.

  • A member arguing against the Nov. 15th policy before yesterday an apostate.
  • A member arguing against the Black Priesthood Ban in 1977 was an apostate.
  • A member arguing against polygamy in 1890 was an apostate.

Yesterday’s doctrine is today’s false doctrine.
Yesterday’s prophets are today’s heretics.”
– Jeremy Runnells